Skip to main content

Fudge it rhymes with budget

CBC News
Somehow, I really don't trust these fellows in government, right now. They've done nothing to impress upon me they in any way understand taxation. Or even representation. They don't understand governing, whatsoever, to be honest.
A $1.9 billion surplus when they'd forecast a $2 billion deficit? Seems shady. Something stinks of a lie.
The most likely reason is the government is excluding something from the budget. Some thing or things totaling $3 billion in spending, not being accounted for by this Conservative government. It'd be nice if we had a budget officer who'd have already looked into the numbers to announce whether the government was being honest or not. However, the current one's a lame duck. Nothing at all like his predecessor, who was a terrier who nipped at the heels of the government.
News organizations seem to be announcing this news without any sense of skepticism. They're acting as government press agents. Should we have expected more from them, though? Probably not. Should we demand better? Yes.

You know, there aren't very many organizations left these days that consider long term planning, any more. That have big ideas that with assertive spending, create big projects that quickly become part of the national fabric.
The railway, the CBC, Air Canada, the NFB, healthcare, Canada Pension Plan, ect, and ect.
There aren't leaders of the three major parties who actually have big ideas.
Harper's not an idea man. He abhors new ideas, whether his own or other's. Were his sort the ones we'd have followed throughout human history, we'd probably still be living in trees and eating raw meat.
Trudeau and Mulcair are pretty much interchangeable. You could switch them their parties, and their platforms wouldn't be any different, whatsoever. Although, to be fair, Mulcair's probably a better economic planner than Trudeau.
Compare their pronouncements on climate change policy with the Green Party's: "Our plan is to move to the virtual elimination of fossil-fuel use in Canada by mid-century. Our short-term target is 40 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, while we are calling for 80 percent reductions below 1990 levels by 2050." That's bold. The Liberal's and NDP's are chicken scratch in comparison. The Green Party also campaigns to recreate a mixed economy. Get Canada away from resource extraction, and back into actually making things (well, to be honest, the NDP also campaigns on this, but the difference is in the climate change policy, which is today inextricably linked with economic planning. Or at least should be inextricably linked).

Honestly, I could give a good god damn about whether the government's budget is in surplus or deficit. Governments are not households, and government budgets shouldn't be compared with households. Nor are they businesses. The business of government is governing.
No, I really don't care much about it, at all.
However, the government's released this budget, fully intending to be judged upon it. And that's different. And what are my feelings? Suspicion. This budget bears investigation. Somebody, hint hint press and opposition parties, needs to look into these numbers, and do it quick, because they stink of fudge.
No, I don't care about the budget, but I do care if the government's being honest about it.


Popular posts from this blog

Most CRA auditors polled say Canada's tax system is skewed to protect the wealthy

CBC News
This is hardly surprising. This should have been a top priority during the new government's installment over these past few years, but it hasn't. Things should be far better, but they're more or less the same as the previous government. Being slightly better than the Cons on taxes on the well-off isn't an inspiring reason to re-elect these chumps, and they're well within the danger zone of losing the next election over reasons such as this. Why bother voting Liberal if all Canada's getting is less-mean Conservatives. Canadians wanted change, not this tepid nonsense.
Worse off, the optics are awful. Canada needs that tax revenue, now more than ever, what with the government fumbling around in regards to that US President who's intent on tanking economies world-wide.

The New Blacklist

Matt Tabbi, Rolling Stone
I share the concerns voiced in this article.
Honestly, the Russians had nothing to do with the 2016 election. The claims being made are now becoming toxic and insensible. It's difficult to bare with progressives and liberals carrying water for neo-liberals and neo-conservatives. People are being fed yellow cake, and are eating it all up, crumbs and all.
There's no good to be had, attacking Trump from this angle. It's absolutely shameful.

Why Did Two-Thirds of These Weird Antelope Suddenly Drop Dead?

The Atlantic
My goodness. What is suggested in this report is how a changing climate can negatively effect our physiology, which could turn our own bodily systems against itself.
Only one factor fit the bill: climate. The places where the saigas died in May 2015 were extremely warm and humid. In fact, humidity levels were the highest ever seen the region since records began in 1948. The same pattern held for two earlier, and much smaller, die-offs from 1981 and 1988. When the temperature gets really hot, and the air gets really wet, saiga die. Climate is the trigger, Pasteurella is the bullet.