Skip to main content

What are the neo-liberals doing?

In the USA, in regards to the election. The neo-liberals are painting the election as stolen by the Russians, as though somehow they swung the electoral college for Trump.
Except, as Ian Welsh points out, even if the leaks and the FBI did ultimately cost H. Clinton the election, both were own-goals. This cannot be stated enough. H. Clinton's email scandal was of her own design. The Russians never forced her to utilize her unsecured private email server. (That's not even getting into stating how the proof showing it was Russians who did it isn't good enough.)
What's especially concerning is how commentators are chasing this lede down a very dangerous rabbit hole. It's unsettling to hear how people would be absolutely fine with the electoral college overturning their decision, because of these accusations.
Well, that's called a coup. And if you're fine with the electoral college overturning result of an election, then you're fine with a coup, and all of its consequences. That probably includes fighting in the streets, demonstrations, and probably, ultimately, injuries and deaths. I suppose that's all fine, so long as they're the deaths of people whom you don't know. They probably don't even believe in the same things as you, anyway, so it's all good, right?
Look, let's face facts. Trump won. He won the electoral college. It's all he needed. He never needed the popular vote, and never bothered with it. He ran a brilliant campaign tailored to win what he needed, and disregarded what he didn't.
Whereas H. Clinton ran a terrible campaign. She ran a losing campaign, tailored to win her nothing more than what she already had. She disregarded and discredited those who would have supported her had she catered to them, such as Bernie supporters. She expected votes she never worked for.
In the end, what we're witnessing is simply another neo-liberal coup in its infancy. They're putting pressure onto the electoral college, and should it turn, then this coup is partway successful. These neo-liberals are simply doing what they've always done in foreign nations, except for the first time, they're brought it home.
Don't people understand how dangerous this is, ultimately? If they succeed, then the republic of the USA loses legitimacy. And legitimacy is key. It's absolutely fundamental.
I don't even know what to say, really.
Trump's odious. His picks for for his staff are odious. But he won. So oppose him in good faith. Oppose him within the limits of the republic. When those limits are breached, it's over. Might as well pack it all in, and never bother with democracy ever again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The human 'superpredator' is unique -- and unsustainable, study says

Los Angeles Times I can't imagine the world in ten years time. Twenty years. It'll be different. As different as the world was even in my own childhood. As different as the world was from my parents' childhoods. My elders speak of our role on this Earth as caretakers. However, we've abandoned this role in favor of materialistic pursuits. Of finite beliefs that will quickly degrade into ash when stressed, as heated glass touching cold water. All cultures historically warn us away from over-indulgence, and yet our own modern society celebrates this behavior as exemplary. This self-interest is our fatal flaw. We take what we want, and we give nothing. This cannot last. There are limits on this Earth we cannot comprehend in full. It is simply too vast. However, what little we do know should terrify us into acting more responsibly, even if only marginally. However we do not even do that. Our leaders urge us on to continue on as we have done. This cannot last. Eventuall...

Highway of Tears gets $3M for transportation safety plan

CBC News Realistically, there's only so much can be done The long term goal should be to be helping these remote communities become more and more self-sufficient so there's less need for a community member to have to travel to and fro their home to a neighbouring town for particular needs, or to strengthen the presence of civilization along side those roads and highways. However, three million dollars? Honestly, it seems quite a bit low. This is over 700 kms, altogether, with many communities, in-between. And the winter conditions alone are harsh and demanding. Three million dollars will be used up, very quickly. The most helpful part of this would probably be the $1.6 million allocated toward BC Transit. An extra bus per community with an extra diver should help, although it's a question if the funding will stretch to cover all the communities, in-between. Considering this is the provincial government, they can only do so much, and only indirectly. Now it's up to ...

Justin Trudeau A 'Stunning Hypocrite,' Top Environmentalist Says

The Huffington Post Canada Some pretty harsh words. And accurate, too. What is the point of more pipelines? Their effect on the Canadian economy seems negligible, at best. At worst, they're sinkholes, employing some, but draining time, money, and manpower from other industries that'd be of more benefit to the Canadian economy as a whole. At some point, the Canadian government's simply going to have to give up on the tar sands. They're a money pit. Canada's days as an oil-producing nation are long over. There's more money being spent on the tar sands then Canada's recouping, now. And the days when barrels of oil were selling at or over $100 per barrel are never coming back.