Skip to main content

Sports salaries, and then real life

A draft, archived, and forgotten. It's released, months late and unfinished. Never mind the now obsolete claims, throughout.

This is merely a thought. Some light consideration of sports salaries. Nothing in-depth. Merely guesswork and supposition. No evidence. No proof. No editing. No expansion. I'm just going to write out some vague ideas that are lurking below the surface of my thoughts. A free writing exercise.
I enjoy sports. Always have. Probably always will. Can no longer play sports. Injuries and accidents have robbed me of mobility, especially in the past five years. I'm done with anything involving running. Or heavy lifting.
Was intrigued to see David Price, formerly (and shortly) of the Toronto Blue Jays had signed with the Boston Red Sox for $217 million dollars. Wow. That's a lot more money than I could earn in my entire lifetime. I'd have to win the lottery. Just wow.
Seems obscene, but then again, I also subscribe to the old maxim, "Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it". In the end, I don't really care. It's ridiculous. It's not really real, in the end.
Honestly, money's a funny thing. We ruin ourselves for it, and it's not actually something tangible. It's merely a promise. A dream. A social contract, of sorts. Which is probably why it works.
I can't bring myself to resent these athletes for signing these contracts. What's ridiculous to me is how there are people in this world who are wealthy enough to give out these sort of pay cheques. That's what's obscene.
How can one person, or any one group of people have such riches. That's ridiculous. How did we allow this?
Through a loophole in our collective consciousness, I suppose. Psychotics are more determined to earn than us normal folk, willing to do anything to make a buck.
And what's funny, is by that, these psychotics really are willing to do anything. They'll subscribe to the most ridiculous notions even when there's evidence enough to suggest they're following some crazy ass line of thinking straight down to its common denominator.
Consider in hockey the idea of 'the code'. It's some form of nebulous values and principles that us mortal observers simply cannot comprehend. Hockey teams simply cannot win without it, somehow. Apparently, it has nothing to do with one team being better at all the measurable hockey bits than its opponent. Hockey teams are more than willing to throw a skilled player to the wolves in favor of goons whose skills involve nothing more than staging fights.
Of course, any organization needs good people throughout it, but....
You know, what I'm trying to say, in the end, is, simply, results matter. In any way of life. But the way sports organizations measure success is oftentimes convoluted and, frankly, insane. It's as predicated on superstition and faith, as much as it relies on simple observation and fact.
The fact is, David Price is probably worth his new pay cheque. The Blue Jays failure in retaining him has probably costed the team wins. But they followed their code, whatever that was.
Let's segue for a moment, here.
Sports are life. One should be able to take values and principles from sports life into real life. You can look around, and see this organization probably needs a rebuild, and this one seems to succeed every year. Let's apply this thinking to politics.
The NDP. And its failure to form government in the most recent election. In fact, the NDP was simply devastated in its electoral results, losing dozens of seats, moving from official opposition to third party. At this point, one would be thinking it's time for an NDP rebuild, right? Not so, according to NDP leadership. Let's stay the course, says NDP leadership. Not throw out the baby with the bathwater, and so forth. But that would probably be insane. Let's be honest, here. One can observe past results, and usually predict future results, if the variables remain the same. In this case, if the NDP leadership remains the same, then the next election will probably follow the same course as the previous one. A downward trend. The NDP should probably change leadership. However, the NDP might not. And that would be crazy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Private Equity is a TERRIBLE Investment... Who Keeps Giving Them Money? — How Money Works

Not too much to comment. Business in the USA and by extension Canada is bad right now. Probably for a generation. We really do need a generational plan to get us out of this mess. A ten to twenty year program, unfortunately. Placing pieces onto the board and moving them where they need to be to make things work again. By pieces, I mean people. We need good strong policies to implement as well. There's a lot to think about.

BC Election Preliminary Results Thoughts and Feelings and Some Preliminary Analysis

The BC NDP will possibly hold onto power in the province of BC. With a Confidence and Supply Agreement with the Greens, they should aim for four years of stable government. However, they should also look inward. They should take good lessons from this near-loss of power. The BC NDP wanted to take a "centrist" position —that they were "safe for business"— but have no idea that the further right the party tacks, the more this plays into the right's strengths giving parties like the BC Conseratives headwinds to go even further right. Rather than safe, the BC NDP needed to announce policies that would've been like swinging haymakers at certain business interests especially for rentals; businesses taking advantage of low wages for international workers; and universities taking advantage of international students. For current rent prices, this plays twofold against the NDP. Rent prices as they are now depress voter turnout for the NDP. People see the NDP as ineffe...

Carney speaks after capitulating to Trump's demands

Dunno how else it can be explained other than capitulation. Carney, you weren't elected to kowtow to Trump. You were elected to stand up to him. Canadians may even start to get buyers remorse for ditching Trudeau for you when he showed far more backbone than this. At least he cared more about Canadian sovereignty than this act. What exactly have you extracted for this? What benefit did this provide for Canadians compared to the billions in revenue Canada stood to gain from the Digital Services Tax as well as protecting Canada's ability to create its own taxes?