Skip to main content

Steven Stamkos, ufa

I've been reading forum and twitter responses toward the news Stamkos was offered $8.5 million per year from the Tampa Bay Lightning.
Stamkos, in terms of hockey salary, is probably worth more than $8.5 million per year. I'd even consider him in the same tier as Malkin, Toews, and Kopitar. Crosby would be in a tier of his own, especially considering he has one of the few lifetime contracts in the NHL.
Anyway, Stamkos is getting eviscerated by Tampa Bay fans, for no reason at all, it seems. He's getting no love. Some people are even claiming he's not even worth that $8.5 million offer.
Which is insane.
Stamkos has a value to the Lightning that might not even be measurable.
He currently has 37 points in 48 games, which is down from seasons past. At first glance. He leads the Lightning in Even Strength points, though, with eighteen. And while his own shooting percentage remains largely the same as years past, his team's shooting percentage when he's on the ice is just over four percent. In years gone by, his team shooting percentage has usually been around or over five percent. That one percent drop has probably costed Stamkos five to ten assists this year.
Consider also, he doesn't actually have a regular line mate to skate with. His most common line mates are stapled to other lines. His most common line mate, Namestnikov, plays the same position as Stamkos. They're both good players, but it seems as though they play as often with each other as they do away. By this point in the season, Stamkos should have nearly 300 to 500 minutes with another forward, but he doesn't. There's just no consistency there. It's a helicopter line, and he's usually carrying the load himself.
The players Stamkos plays best with are carrying other lines. It's an old tactic used to 'spread' out the scoring, I suppose. And it works, largely. But were Stamkos to spend the season with Kucherov and Namestnikov that'd probably be in the conversation for best line in hockey. Their Corsi numbers together are simply gaudy, and would wreck the Eastern conference. Together, they run the table at nearly 65% Corsi for, and defend at 50% Corsi against. Those are insane numbers.
Kucherov plus Johnson are a great line. Stamkos plus Kucherov would be an elite line.
One could almost consider Stamkos is getting shafted by the Lightning head coach, having to play with the second best options on the team rather than the best option, right off the bat. And the choices go down through the line up rather than up.
One more important fact to consider, is despite how the Tampa Bay lines are deployed, Stamkos is still receiving the most on-ice attention from opposing teams. And he's still better than even, carrying a huge offensive load on his own. Take him out of the Lightning line up, and that opposition attention is spread downwards. The impact won't be huge, of course, but it'll be felt, somewhat. And that marginal difference is usually felt later in the season, and in the playoffs.
If Stamkos walks from the Lightning, it'll be a loss for them. They'll still be playoff contenders, but they will no longer be Stanley Cup contenders. They'll have to make up the difference losing Stamkos' play by playing harder than they are, now. More scoring by committee.
Well, it's the Lightning's choice, of course.


Popular posts from this blog

Most CRA auditors polled say Canada's tax system is skewed to protect the wealthy

CBC News
This is hardly surprising. This should have been a top priority during the new government's installment over these past few years, but it hasn't. Things should be far better, but they're more or less the same as the previous government. Being slightly better than the Cons on taxes on the well-off isn't an inspiring reason to re-elect these chumps, and they're well within the danger zone of losing the next election over reasons such as this. Why bother voting Liberal if all Canada's getting is less-mean Conservatives. Canadians wanted change, not this tepid nonsense.
Worse off, the optics are awful. Canada needs that tax revenue, now more than ever, what with the government fumbling around in regards to that US President who's intent on tanking economies world-wide.

The New Blacklist

Matt Tabbi, Rolling Stone
I share the concerns voiced in this article.
Honestly, the Russians had nothing to do with the 2016 election. The claims being made are now becoming toxic and insensible. It's difficult to bare with progressives and liberals carrying water for neo-liberals and neo-conservatives. People are being fed yellow cake, and are eating it all up, crumbs and all.
There's no good to be had, attacking Trump from this angle. It's absolutely shameful.

Why Did Two-Thirds of These Weird Antelope Suddenly Drop Dead?

The Atlantic
My goodness. What is suggested in this report is how a changing climate can negatively effect our physiology, which could turn our own bodily systems against itself.
Only one factor fit the bill: climate. The places where the saigas died in May 2015 were extremely warm and humid. In fact, humidity levels were the highest ever seen the region since records began in 1948. The same pattern held for two earlier, and much smaller, die-offs from 1981 and 1988. When the temperature gets really hot, and the air gets really wet, saiga die. Climate is the trigger, Pasteurella is the bullet.